What an entitled, lazy and disturbing world view. It's not our responsibility to go find it. It's *your* responsibility to provide that information. People state they want more information about those claims. That's not the way things work if you want to be taken seriously. If your interested, take the initiative and look for it yourself. The terms intent was to automatically discredit anyone who questions the establishment narrative, labeling them as intellectually / emotionally illegitimate. Brought to you by your friendly CIA in the early sixties. Since you mentioned it, look up the origins of the term “conspiracy theorist”. This of course, after shutting down, and continuing to purge accounts of those considered guilty of thought crimes. Interestingly enough many of the same companies are now using their support of the Electronic Frontier Foundation as a way to virtue signal their support for internet freedom- whatever that means in their twisted logic. In the face of nearly every major Silicon Valley entity, from computer manufacturers, service providers, Google ( Gagg-le), social media, to payment platforms initiating censorship measures or de-platforming, the attempt to de-legitimize my mention of Firefoxes activity is well. Then again your quip about conspiracy websites, is telling. Admittedly, I do not spend much time on Deep State conspiracy-oriented websites either LOL. I have kept up with Firefox development but I haven't run across anything about algorithm-level censorship by Mozilla developers. Yes, some links to your sources would be helpful. If memory serves, this became known approx.
Do a search on it and you should find more info, although it received little coverage. Firefox was quite forward about it, issuing comments etc. It’s at an algorithm level if I remember correctly. Hopefully Apple will respond with a fix but I'm not holding my breath. When I visited a popular Mac forum yesterday it was teeming with angry Apple customers incensed by what has been done to Safari. I can't even access the drop-down notifications menu. Using 1Password to login is problematic and I am unable to post replies.
#ADBLOCK FOR SAFARI MAC REVIEW UPDATE#
The update has broken the Digital Photography Review website. On the other hand, I took Safari 13.1 for a test-run this morning. If you don't want to use the Firefox filtering options, they can be disabled. And I visit a large number of websites because of my interest in politics, health, the environment and much more. I haven't experienced anything that resembles "censorship." I've been able to access every website I want to without exception. I've been using Firefox with its two filtering features enabled/disabled with various settings. Then again, quite typical for the Silicon Valley mindset. They have great privacy plugins, but then appointed themselves censors to protect the user from material they deem as thought crime worthy. I had used Firefox for quite a few years but dumped it after they initiated censorship initiatives in the last year and a half. Brave is a work in progress, but it’s getting there. I’ve been using Brave for the last year or so, opening Safari when needing to for sites that Brave has a hard time with.
and wow- pop ups and all sorts of crazy activity galore.
#ADBLOCK FOR SAFARI MAC REVIEW UPGRADE#
After the 13 upgrade I inadvertently launched Safari.
0 kommentar(er)
